ArticleRadiologia brasileira
The central vein sign and paramagnetic rim lesions: biomarkers for an accurate differential diagnosis between multiple sclerosis and migraine.
Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Expert Panel Consensus Guidelines of the German Society of Neuroradiology on the Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Multiple Sclerosis.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Guideline
- Multiple sclerosis as an asynchronous neuroinflammatory system.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess whether the evaluation of the central vein sign (CVS) and paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can distinguish multiple sclerosis (MS) from migraine. Materials and Methods: In this single-center observational study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the CVS, determining the proportion of CVS-positive lesions per individual and absolute counts, using thresholds of 3 lesions (select3*) and 6 lesions (select6*), and of PRLs in participants with MS and in those with migraine, from 3.0-T MRI brain scans. Results: The study included 20 participants with MS, 20 with migraine, and 20 included as healthy controls. The proportion of participants with CVS-positive lesions was higher in the MS group than in the migraine group (61.8% vs. 10.4%), and PRLs were observed exclusively in the MS group. The presence of at least one PRL and the select6* criterion demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy within the study sample. Conclusion: The detection of the CVS and of a PRL on 3.0-T MRI scans may serve as a reliable biomarker to differentiate MS from migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.