ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Endoscopic vs. microscopic tympanoplasty in children: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic tympanoplasty (TPL) types I-III in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 70 TPL cases in 58 pediatric patients at Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, from June 2017 to December 2023. Data on hearing function, graft intake, residual disease, operating time and complications were collected. Results: We observed mean postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) of 16.83 dB using the endoscopic and 19.37 dB for the microscopic techniques, as well as a higher graft intake rate (91%) for the endoscopic compared to the microscopic group (80%), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. No residual cholesteatoma was found in the endoscopic group, while the microscopic group had a significantly higher incidence of residual disease (42%; Conclusion: Endoscopic tympanoplasty in pediatric patients achieves similar audiological outcomes and graft intake rates compared to the microscopic approach while offering significant advantages, including reduced operation times and lower complication rates. This minimally invasive approach is highly effective especially regarding cholesteatoma resection and provides excellent functional and structural outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.