Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036265›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2025

Personalizing Auditory Training: Understanding Individual Factors in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.

Terrin N Tamati, Michayla M Saraino, Sarah M Birenbaum, Aaron C Moberly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Terrin N TamatiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Michayla M SarainoDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sarah M BirenbaumDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Aaron C MoberlyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Predicting Speech Recognition in Adults Receiving Cochlear ImplantsR01DC019088 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MOBERLY, AARON C · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
Social Networks for Optimizing Communication Ability in Adult Cochlear Implant UsersR01AG089200 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Terrin Nichole Tamati · 2024 to 2026
$1.9M
Beyond Clinical Measures: Auditory-Social Experience and Robust Communication Skills in Adults Following Cochlear ImplantationR21DC019382 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMATI, TERRIN NICHOLE · 2022 to 2024
$634k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG089200NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019088NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC019382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) are an incredibly effective surgical intervention for many adults with moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss and ideally improve communication ability and quality of life. However, although CIs restore sound access, they do not guarantee real-world speech communication abilities. To optimize communication outcomes, CI users have access to numerous auditory training (AT) approaches, including patient-directed and clinician-guided interventions. Despite the widespread use of AT, research on its benefits in adult CI users remains limited, resulting in a critical gap in understanding the individual factors that drive variability in training outcomes among adult CI users. This review paper synthesizes evidence on demographic, auditory, cognitive-linguistic, and psychosocial factors that influence responsiveness to AT. Given the well-documented influence of these factors on speech perception outcomes in adult CI users, we propose that a set of shared or unique factors likely predict CI users' responses to AT interventions. By understanding individual differences, future AT interventions can be better tailored to the needs of each CI user, moving beyond a one-size-fits-all model. In addition, we discuss the need to broaden our outcome assessments of AT beyond traditional speech recognition measures to real-world speech communicative and social functioning, which are likely to impact hearing-related and overall quality of life in this patient population. These insights provide a foundation for more effective, personalized AT strategies that address the diverse needs of adult CI users.

Indexed as

auditory trainingcochlear implantscognitionindividual differencesspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID41036265
PMCPMC12483579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.