Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036264›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2025

The Impacts of Two Adaptive Auditory-Cognitive Training Paradigms on Listening to Competing Talkers.

Charlie Fisher, Michael A Johns, Lien P Decruy, Regina C Calloway, Jason L Dunlap, Jonathan Z Simon, Samira Anderson, Stefanie E Kuchinsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlie FisherDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Michael A JohnsInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Lien P DecruyInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Regina C CallowayInstitute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Jason L DunlapDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Jonathan Z SimonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Samira AndersonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Stefanie E KuchinskyDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.

Funding

Speech Perception with High Cognitive DemandP01AG055365 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GORDON-SALANT, SANDRA M · 2017 to 2021
$8.4M
COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Multilevel Auditory Processing of Continuous Speech, from Acoustics to LanguageR01DC019394 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SIMON, JONATHAN Z. · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG055365NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019394NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech intelligibility among competing talkers becomes more difficult with age, even for older adults with clinically normal hearing. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the implementation of auditory-cognitive training to improve speech-in-noise recognition performance, particularly for older adults. In this study, we implemented two levels of cognitive demand in an adaptive auditory-cognitive training program that used a competing-speaker paradigm. Older adults with normal to near-normal hearing thresholds were assessed on training performance (at the individual and group level), self-reported training strategies, and far-transfer learning in a speech-perception-in-noise task. Training performance analysis revealed that some older adults, particularly those in the more demanding training, performed poorly during the auditory-cognitive training itself. Some participants in this group reported disengagement, potentially due to the low level of those individuals' self-reported satisfaction with engaging in challenging tasks in daily life. Despite these challenges, however, both groups generally improved in the far-transfer learning assessment, though there was variation among participants. Our results suggest that too-high levels of cognitive demand within the auditory-cognitive training may limit some aspects of training outcomes for speech perception in noise; however, higher cognitive demand may be beneficial for those who enjoy challenging tasks.

Indexed as

auditory trainingcognitive loadcompeting speakersindividual differencesolder adults

Identifiers

PMID41036264
PMCPMC12483581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.