Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036262›Full record

ReviewSeminars in hearing2025

Computer-based Auditory Training in New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Review of Training Outcomes in More than 100 Patients in the Outpatient Setting.

James R Dornhoffer, Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac, Judy R Dubno, Theodore R McRackan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in hearing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James R DornhofferDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kara C Schvartz-LeyzacDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Theodore R McRackanDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To review research on the effectiveness of computer-based auditory training (CBAT) in new adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Methods: Studies by the primary author on auditory training in new adult CI recipients were reviewed, focusing on a database of auditory training data in >100 patients followed over their first-year post-activation. Results: CBAT, as used in a standard outpatient setting, affords benefits compared to other commonly employed exercises/programs. In new adult CI users, CBAT was associated with greater improvement in CNC words, AzBio sentences, and Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 (CIQOL-35) Profile scores at 3 months post-activation compared to CI recipients who did not train or used other resources. By 12 months, patients showed similar improvement in speech recognition scores, regardless of training modality; however, patients who used CBAT continued to show significantly greater improvement in CIQOL global and all domain scores compared to CBAT nonusers. This benefit was noted regardless of whether CBAT was started before or after 3 months post-activation. No demographic/lifestyle factors, audiological measures, or pre-CI CIQOL/CIQOL-Expectations scores were associated with CBAT use. Conclusion: CBAT during the first-year post-activation may contribute to early gains in CI speech recognition and to persistent improvements in functional abilities, as measured via the CIQOL-35 profile, in new implant recipients. Consideration of specific recommendations for the use of CBAT resources may be valuable, given the minimal risk, ease of access, and affordability of these programs.

Indexed as

auditory trainingaural rehabilitationcochlear implant

Identifiers

PMID41036262
PMCPMC12483583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.