ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Privacy-, linguistic-, and information-preserving synthesis of clinical documentation through generative agents.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Biomarkers for Early Detection and Monitoring of Neurological Disorders: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Benchmarking large language models against human experts in rehabilitation medicine: a multidimensional evaluation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Implementing generative artificial intelligence in precision oncology: safety, governance, and significance.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread adoption of generative agents (GAs) is reshaping the healthcare landscape. Nonetheless, broad utilization is impeded by restricted access to high-quality, interoperable clinical documentation from electronic health records (EHRs) due to persistent legal, ethical, and technical barriers. Synthetic health data generation (SHDG), leveraging pre-trained large language models (LLMs) instantiated as GAs, could offer a practical solution by creating synthetic patient information that mimics genuine EHRs. The use of LLMs, however, is not without issues; significant concerns remain regarding privacy, potential bias propagation, the risk of generating inaccurate or misleading content, and the lack of transparency in how these models make decisions. We therefore propose a privacy-, linguistic-, and information-preserving SHDG protocol that employs multiple context-aware, role-specific GAs. Guided by targeted prompting and authentic EHRs-serving as structural and linguistic templates-role-specific GAs can, in principle, operate collaboratively through multi-turn interactions. We theorized that utilizing GAs in this fashion permits LLMs not only to produce synthetic EHRs that are accurate, consistent, and contextually appropriate, but also to expose the underlying decision-making process. To test this hypothesis, we developed a no-code GA-driven SHDG workflow as a proof of concept, which was implemented within a predefined, multi-layered data science infrastructure (DSI) stack-an integrated ensemble of software and hardware designed to support rapid prototyping and deployment. The DSI stack streamlines implementation for healthcare professionals, improving accessibility, usability, and cybersecurity. To deploy and validate GA-assisted workflows, we implemented a fully automated SHDG evaluation framework-co-developed with GenAI technology-which holistically compares the informational and linguistic features of synthetic, anonymized, and real EHRs at both the document and corpus levels. Our findings highlight that SHDG implemented through GAs offers a scalable, transparent, and reproducible methodology for unlocking the potential of clinical documentation to drive innovation, accelerate research, and advance the development of learning health systems. The source code, synthetic datasets, toolchains and prompts created for this study can be accessed at the GitHub repository: https://github.com/HR-DataLab-Healthcare/RESEARCH_SUPPORT/tree/main/PROJECTS/Generative_Agent_based_Data-Synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.