Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036253›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Privacy-, linguistic-, and information-preserving synthesis of clinical documentation through generative agents.

Mark van Velzen, Robert F van der Willigen, Vincent J de Beer, Helen I de Graaf-Waar, Esther R C Janssen, Sjemaine van Leeuwen, Micha F van der Willigen, Martijn J van der Willigen, Gavin Renardus, Rayan El Maaroufi and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mark van Velzen *Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Robert F van der Willigen *Data Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Vincent J de BeerData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Helen I de Graaf-WaarData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Esther R C JanssenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands.
Sjemaine van LeeuwenMedifit Bewegingscentrum, Oss, Netherlands.
Micha F van der WilligenData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Martijn J van der WilligenData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Gavin RenardusData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Rayan El MaaroufiData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Sven J SatiminData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Larissa M HartogData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Tim HulsenData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Nico L U van MeeterenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Department of Cariothoracic Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Mark C ScheperData Supported Healthcare: Data-Science Unit, Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of generative agents (GAs) is reshaping the healthcare landscape. Nonetheless, broad utilization is impeded by restricted access to high-quality, interoperable clinical documentation from electronic health records (EHRs) due to persistent legal, ethical, and technical barriers. Synthetic health data generation (SHDG), leveraging pre-trained large language models (LLMs) instantiated as GAs, could offer a practical solution by creating synthetic patient information that mimics genuine EHRs. The use of LLMs, however, is not without issues; significant concerns remain regarding privacy, potential bias propagation, the risk of generating inaccurate or misleading content, and the lack of transparency in how these models make decisions. We therefore propose a privacy-, linguistic-, and information-preserving SHDG protocol that employs multiple context-aware, role-specific GAs. Guided by targeted prompting and authentic EHRs-serving as structural and linguistic templates-role-specific GAs can, in principle, operate collaboratively through multi-turn interactions. We theorized that utilizing GAs in this fashion permits LLMs not only to produce synthetic EHRs that are accurate, consistent, and contextually appropriate, but also to expose the underlying decision-making process. To test this hypothesis, we developed a no-code GA-driven SHDG workflow as a proof of concept, which was implemented within a predefined, multi-layered data science infrastructure (DSI) stack-an integrated ensemble of software and hardware designed to support rapid prototyping and deployment. The DSI stack streamlines implementation for healthcare professionals, improving accessibility, usability, and cybersecurity. To deploy and validate GA-assisted workflows, we implemented a fully automated SHDG evaluation framework-co-developed with GenAI technology-which holistically compares the informational and linguistic features of synthetic, anonymized, and real EHRs at both the document and corpus levels. Our findings highlight that SHDG implemented through GAs offers a scalable, transparent, and reproducible methodology for unlocking the potential of clinical documentation to drive innovation, accelerate research, and advance the development of learning health systems. The source code, synthetic datasets, toolchains and prompts created for this study can be accessed at the GitHub repository: https://github.com/HR-DataLab-Healthcare/RESEARCH_SUPPORT/tree/main/PROJECTS/Generative_Agent_based_Data-Synthesis.

Indexed as

clinical natural language processing (NLP)data synthesisgenerative agentshealthcareinformation theorylinguisticsprivacysynthetic health data generation (SHDG)

Identifiers

PMID41036253
PMCPMC12479492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.