ArticlePNAS nexus2025
Hotspot model shows how location-based superspreading accelerates and reshapes epidemics.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During outbreaks of many diseases, a small number of infected individuals are responsible for a disproportionately large number of new infections in what are called superspreading events (SSEs). SSEs broadly fall into four categories: (i) a single individual is more infectious due to biological differences in their infection or (ii) their greater degree of social connection; or (iii) the disease spreads more readily in certain high-risk facilities or (iv) "opportunistic" situations such as large gatherings. Existing modeling approaches work well to understand the first two of these but are not well suited to describe the dynamics in the latter two. Here, we introduce a simple agent-based model which captures the essential features of disease spreading more readily at high-risk locations or gatherings, which we call "hotspots." In our model, disease spreads and people recover as in a standard Susceptible, Infected, Recovered model, but agents are also characterized by individual probability of visiting the hotspot where disease spreads much more readily, providing an additional risk structure to the population. We use this model to investigate how an outbreak's probability, peak, and final size all vary under different risk heterogeneity assumptions. We show how some particular distributions of risk-taking behavior across the population heighten these effects. We complement our simulations with analytic results that provide theoretical bases for all of our numerical results and allow for robust interpretation and prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.