ArticleHealth care transitions2025
Transition services in 22q11 deletion syndrome: Hit or miss.
Article in Health care transitions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) is a rare genetic condition and the most common microdeletion in humans. The symptomatology is broad and variable between individuals. It is usually diagnosed in childhood and requires a multidisciplinary lifelong approach including a structured transitional care process. This study therefore seeks to enrich our understanding of transitional care for individuals with 22q11DS by exploring the insights from healthcare professionals (HCPs) from Europe and Canada with multidisciplinary backgrounds. Methods: This interview study was part of a larger mixed-methods research project, with the qualitative component concentrating on gathering insights from HCPs involved in patient care through semi-structured interviews. We conducted qualitative thematic analysis while focusing on transitional care within families caring for a child with 22q11DS from the perspective of HCPs. Results: The 20 HCPs interviewed came from diverse professional backgrounds and all had clinical experience with 22q11DS. Our analysis of the data identified three primary themes. Our participants emphasized the inadequacy of the transitional care system, despite its critical importance. HCPs tried their best to overcome the challenges by relying on longer follow-up with their patients, with some even merging children and adult services. There was a shared desire among HCPs for a structured transitional care plan, better access to adult services for 22q11DS, and a more integrated, collaborative approach. Conclusion: This study highlights the inadequacy of transitional care for individuals with 22q11DS and their families, showing a need to better align policies and clinical practice. Filling the gap between existing policies and the desired transitional care services is essential. The latter includes: an appropriate longitudinal transition plan, strong psychological support not only for the individual with 22q11DS but also for their family, a coordination system, and accessible adult services with expertise on 22q11DS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.