ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Quantifying the environmental and economic impact of telephone follow-up in hand surgery: A single surgeon's experience.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The National Health Service (NHS) in England generates approximately 24.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually. Achieving net-zero emissions requires contributions from all clinical specialties. Orthopaedics, as a high-emission specialty, has a critical role to play in this transition. The COVID-19 pandemic catalysed the widespread adoption of telephone consultations, which have demonstrated patient satisfaction, favourable clinical outcomes, and potential environmental benefits. This study evaluated the environmental and economic impact of a single surgeon's shift to telephone follow-up appointments. Materials and methods: Patients who received telephone follow-up consultations between March 2020 and March 2023 in one surgeon's clinic were retrospectively identified. Case notes were reviewed to determine diagnosis, treatment type, and need for further in-person follow-up. Travel distances were estimated based on patient addresses, and deprivation scores were calculated using postcode-linked indices. Results: A total of 118 telephone consultations were identified; six patients were excluded due to missing address data. Of the remaining 112, 37.5 % had carpal tunnel syndrome, 62 % followed surgical intervention, and 25 % followed injection. Secondary in-person follow-up was required in 26 % of cases, with no significant difference between postoperative and post-injection patients (p = 0.59). The intervention resulted in an estimated 1284 miles of travel avoided and a saving of 0.33 tonnes of CO Discussion: This study demonstrates that even a modest change in outpatient follow-up practices by a single clinician can yield measurable environmental benefits. Savings in patient expenses were found, particularly among those from disadvantaged backgrounds. If implemented across the NHS, such changes have the potential to significantly reduce emissions without compromising patient care and reduce direct costs to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.