ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025
Dosimetric Performance of Orthogonal Dual-Layer Multi-Leaf Collimator System on Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: Cardiac Substructures Sparing Plans.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to reduce the risk of cardiovascular incidents and radiation pneumonia (RP) by improving the dose distribution to cardiac substructures through the use of a dual-layer multileaf collimator (MLC) accelerator- VenusX. Methods and Materials: Eighteen patients with advanced-stage lung cancer were selected for this study. The total lung, spinal cord, whole heart, and specific cardiac substructures (including the left ventricle [LV], pulmonary artery, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery [LCX], and coronary artery) were delineated as organs at risk and incorporated into the optimization process of the avoidance plan. Single-layer MLC plans optimized for the whole heart, referred to as S-WH plans (where WH denotes whole heart), were developed alongside single-layer MLC plans specifically designed to avoid cardiac substructures, known as S-CS plans (where CS denotes cardiac substructures). Additionally, dual-layer MLC avoidance plans, designated as D-CS plans, were created for each patient. We evaluated the relative risk of coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, acute cardiac events, and RP, as well as the effective dose to the immune system. Results: D-CS plans significantly reduced the dose metrics of LV, pulmonary artery, left anterior descending artery, LCX, and the coronary, while maintaining target coverage and achieving comparable conformity index to the S-WH plans. Additionally, the D-CS plans significantly decreased the volume receiving 5 Gy (V Conclusions: The dual-layer MLC system demonstrated superior performance compared to the single-layer MLC system in CS-avoidance plans, providing new opportunities for subsequent immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced lung cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.