ArticleClinical case reports2025
Asymptomatic Uterine Rupture in a Pregnancy Following B-Lynch Suture Application in a Previous Delivery: A Case Report.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Asymptomatic Uterine Rupture in a Pregnancy Following B-Lynch Suture Application in a Previous Delivery: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The B-Lynch suture, designed to control severe postpartum hemorrhage by compressing the uterus, is effective in reducing maternal mortality rates. However, it can lead to complications such as infection and uterine necrosis. This report presents a rare case of asymptomatic uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy following a B-Lynch suture. A woman in her mid-30s, gravida 3, para 2, presented at 32 weeks gestation in labor and underwent a repeat caesarean section. During delivery and visualization of the uterus, a 3-cm uterine rent was incidentally discovered near the site of the previous B-Lynch suture at the posterior aspect of the uterus. On review of prior medical reports provided by the patient, it was noted that the B-Lynch procedure was previously performed using Polydioxanone sutures rather than traditional absorbable sutures and was deemed a potential contributor to this presentation. This case emphasizes the importance of appropriate suture materials and techniques when performing a B-Lynch suture and presents a less commonly known potential long-term effect and complication. Further, obstetricians should be wary in subsequent pregnancies of the potential for uterine rents and aim to carefully visualize the previous suture site intraoperatively, regardless of symptomatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.