Incidence, Risk Factors, and Subsequent Health Outcomes of Pyogenic Liver Abscesses: A Scoping Review of Evidence From Population-Based Studies.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Bacterial versus parasitic liver abscesses in children: a retrospective cohort study of clinical and laboratory differences.BMC pediatrics · 2026
   Article
2. When Clinical Improvement Does Not Reflect Radiological Response: A Culture-Negative Giant Pyogenic Liver Abscess.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
3. Liver abscess complicated by sepsis due toFrontiers in medicine · 2026
   Article
4. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of liver abscesses: a 12-year retrospective analysis from a tertiary care center in the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as