ArticleJournal of patient experience2025
Amplifying the Future of Patient Voices and Cross-Disease Networking Through the Advocacy Exchange.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient advocacy is essential for progress in healthcare to improve clinical practice and treatments, but advocacy is neither well understood nor supported. Advocacy work is often placed on those already negotiating social burdens, caregiving, and diagnoses. The Advocacy Exchange (TAE) rose as a community-led, public-private partnership, becoming the largest cross-cultural, cross-therapeutic, global network of health-related advocates. TAE is co-created with leaders from the nonprofit, healthcare, governmental, and business sectors as an innovative accelerator of advocacy-industry relationships, integrating patient experience into healthcare systems and supporting individuals on advocacy journeys, whether they are 3 days or 3 decades postdiagnosis. Across 4 years of online gatherings, resource sharing, and partnership-matching, TAE has reached 77,500 website visitors from 120 countries with 7100 registrants representing more than 325 organizations. Forty-five live sessions co-created with advocates show robust community participation for sessions on health equity, patient dignity, and patient voice, leading to 50-plus hours of YouTube content viewed 97,000 times with 15 million social media impressions. Survey data show an engaged community grateful for peer connections and collective problem-solving. Lessons learned can serve to accelerate public-private partnerships and amplify patient voices. Themes include: (1) individuals being forced into advocacy by need; (2) consistent presence of barriers and discrimination in healthcare; (3) importance of discussing hard subjects; (4) need for neutral meeting spaces; and (5) opportunities to bridge industries and advocacy for progress. TAE will broaden its umbrella by building more partnerships for community members, targeting access and equity in healthcare, and shaping the understanding of advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.