ReviewBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2025
Clinical Management of Circulating Tumor DNA in Breast Cancer: Detection, Prediction, and Monitoring.
Review in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recurrence in Real Time: Rethinking Breast Cancer Follow-Up Evaluation with Circulating Tumor DNA.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Evolution of the Use of Circulating DNA as a Biomarker in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Review
- From detection to action: ctDNA-MRD surveillance and translational strategies in early breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Small extracellular vesicles as system-level regulators and predictive biomarkers in breast cancer progression and chemoresistance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- The mechanisms and therapeutic advances of interactions between breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite substantial progress in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer, current therapeutic regimens exhibit limitations, necessitating the identification of more robust biomarkers to optimize personalized strategies. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as a non-invasive liquid biopsy modality, overcomes the inherent constraints of biopsies in capturing tumor heterogeneity. Accumulating evidence from prospective cohort studies demonstrates the clinical utility of ctDNA in risk stratification, guidance of therapeutic decision-making, recurrence surveillance and other clinical applications. Furthermore, ctDNA profiling enhances real-time pharmacodynamic monitoring and accelerates drug development by identifying molecular responders. The methodical requirements and challenges inherent in implementing liquid biopsy assessments in the clinic are examined. These encompass critical pre-analytical variables, the need for highly sensitive and specific analytical techniques, standardization of assays and bioinformatics pipelines across laboratories and the complexities of interpreting results. This review synthesizes current evidence supporting ctDNA integration into breast cancer management frameworks and systematically addresses its methodological challenges and clinical limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.