ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Home Tonometry Diurnal Intraocular Pressure Patterns, Patient Adherence, and Measurement Reliability in a Prospective Clinical Cohort.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Assess patient adherence, diurnal intraocular pressure patterns, and correlation with in-office tonometry of home intraocular pressure monitoring (IOP). Patients and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 75 patients with open-angle disease (150 eyes) were recruited and loaned the iCare HOME2 tonometer (ICH2) after in-person training and instructed to take 6 measurements per day for 10 ± 4 days. Statistical analysis of adherence, diurnal IOP patterns, and correlation with in-office tonometry was conducted. Results: Most patients had good adherence (65% of patients took ≥ 6 measurements per day, median 7.4 measurements/day). However, adherence was poor for a notable minority of patients (19% of patients took less than 2 measurements per day). Patients with low adherence reported difficulty obtaining measurements and desire for more training with the ICH2 device. ICH2 identified diurnal patterns of IOP fluctuation: IOP varied significantly over the 24-hour day (p < 0.0001), and early morning peak IOP at 3 AM decreased significantly throughout the day to minimum mean IOP at 10 PM (p < 0.0001). IOP variance was significantly greater outside of clinic hours (p < 0.0001) and 36% of patients had maximum IOP outside of clinic hours. In-office IOP measurements had significant positive correlation to the closest ICH2 measurement obtained by the patient in time for both Goldman applanation (r Conclusion: ICH2 is clinically useable and effective for detecting out-of-office IOP spikes, diurnal IOP patterns, and IOP variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.