ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Two illustrative cases of papillary tumor of the pineal region: Clinical presentation, management, and outcomes.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) are rare brain tumors thought to originate from specialized ependymal cell remnants. Their clinical behavior varies, typically manifesting as symptoms of increased intracranial pressure. Due to their rarity, literature on PTPR is limited, complicating the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines. We present two illustrative cases describing their diagnostic workup, management and respective outcomes. Case Description: This article presents two cases of PTPR, both diagnosed in adult females with a shared clinical presentation of hydrocephalus-associated symptoms. The first case, a 47-year-old patient, presented in October 2014 with progressive headaches, nausea, and vomiting. The second case, a 40-year-old patient, presented in October 2020 with a two-week history of diplopia, headache, and imbalance. Both patients underwent operative interventions, including biopsy and ventriculostomy, followed by tumor resection. Histological analysis confirmed PTPR in both cases, classified as WHO grade 2-3 and grade 3, respectively. The two cases also received radiation therapy, with case 1 demonstrating longstanding tumor control throughout follow-up, and case 2 experiencing aggressive metastatic activity in spite of repeated onco-surgical treatment. Conclusion: These cases highlight the complex management of PTPR as well as the significance of tailored interventions and long-term surveillance for improved outcomes. Surgical resection, in conjunction with adjuvant or salvage high dose radiation, remains of essence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.