ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Clear cell meningioma: Experience at a medical center.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clear cell meningiomas (CCMs) are a rare variant, represent approximately 1% of all craniospinal meningiomas reported worldwide, and typically appear in young and adult individuals, more frequently in women. Although they are classified by the World Health Organization as grade 2, they are meningiomas that often behave aggressively and have a high recurrence rate. Case Description: 337 records of patients with a histopathological diagnosis of intracranial meningiomas were retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and December 2022. Three CCM cases are presented as examples. From the 337 records analyzed, 10 were CCM-related (2.96%). This paper describes three cases of meningiomas operated on at La Raza National Medical Center Specialty Hospital (HECMNR) (HECMNR, in Spanish), which belongs to the Mexican Institute of Social Security. The first case was operated with a Simpson grade I resection of the lesion and then developed other two recurrence events, which required another two interventions with Simpson II and III resections, respectively, despite oncological therapy. The second instance utilized a Simpson III resection and was promptly subjected to radiotherapy and currently developed tumoral recurrence that will soon require resection. The third case used a Simpson V resection, since the severe cerebral edema prevented a higher degree of resection. Conclusion: CCMs have a high risk of recurrence, making reintervention necessary, and therefore, cranial deformity and severe functional and neurological complications may follow, which explains the difficulty in managing this pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.