ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Silent growth, striking impact: A rare case of intracranial chondroma and review of literature.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sellar chondroma in a pediatric patient treated endoscopically: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chondromas are benign tumors accounting for 0.2-0.3% of all intracranial tumors. They are composed of embryonic cartilaginous material and mostly occur in extradural locations or less frequently in paranasal sinuses, choroid plexus, and dura. In this report, we present a case where a young patient presented with bifrontal parafalcine chondroma. Case Description: A 32-year-old female presented with headache for the past 2 years along with blurry vision and forgetfulness for the past 2 months. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain showed a bifrontal mixed-intensity lesion located in the parasagittal region on T2-weighted sequence with areas of hypo and hyperintensities. The lesion showed areas of heterogeneous contrast enhancement. She underwent neuronavigation-guided bifrontal craniotomy and maximum safe resection of the lesion. Postoperative MRI showed near total resection of the lesion along with development of acute infarcts in bilateral frontotemporal lesion. Her postoperative course was complicated by anterior cerebral artery territory infarcts, contributing to low Glasgow Coma Scale and left-sided weakness. She experienced recurrent seizures and respiratory complications, necessitating elective tracheostomy. After a 25-day hospital stay, she was discharged. At 4-month follow-up, she showed significant neurological improvement, including resolution of lower-limb weakness and tracheostomy removal. However, MRI suggested tumor recurrence, which remained stable at 6- and 9-month follow-ups. Conclusion: Intracranial chondromas are rare neoplasms of the skull mostly presenting in the third decade of life. They are slow growing and can gain enormous size leading to chronic symptoms, particularly long-standing headaches. There is high variability in the location of these tumors, and our analysis suggests that more than 30% of the tumors arise from convexity. Chondromas are a rare entity which makes it difficult to distinguish from craniopharyngioma, pituitary adenoma, and meningioma, so these should be considered as important differentials. Our literature review showed 73.3% of the chondromas appeared hypointense on T1 sequence and 46.7% were found to be heterogenous on T2 sequence which aligns with previous studies. Gross total resection is the gold standard treatment while the role of radio and chemotherapy remains controversial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.