Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036011›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Isolation of some microbial genera from beef carcasses in Mosul slaughterhouse.

Omar A Al-Mahmood, Ayman M Albanna, Israa M Jweer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omar A Al-MahmoodDepartment of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Ayman M AlbannaCollege of Environmental Science, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq.
Israa M JweerHealth Supervision Division, Nineveh Health Directorate, Ministry of Health and Environment, Mosul, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The lack of modern slaughtering establishments and unsanitary practices can result in excessive microbial contamination of carcasses, posing health risks and causing economic losses. Aim: This study aimed to identify the numerous genera of bacteria that contaminated beef carcasses and estimate their percentages using a culture method and confirmation using the VITEK 2 methodology. Methods: This study included 96 swabs collected from beef carcasses after final wash at a slaughterhouse in Nineveh Governorate, Iraq, between October and November 2023. All samples were grown on different media for 24 hours at 37°C to assess their phenotypic characteristics of colonies. Results: All samples contained aerobic bacteria (100%). Our data revealed several genera in beef carcasses. Of the 96 samples, 23 (23.9%) were positive for the beef microbiological profile (coliform bacilli and opportunistic pathogens). Seven genera were isolated and verified using the VITEK 2 Compact System. Conclusion: In our investigation, the quantity of bacteria in beef carcasses was generally acceptable, indicating commitment to the slaughterhouse's food safety guidelines.

Indexed as

AbattoirsBacteriaFood MicrobiologyRed MeatAnimalsCattleIraqColiform bacilliMosul abattoirOpportunistic pathogensVITEK 2 system

Identifiers

PMID41036011
PMCPMC12483407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.