Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41036003›Full record

ReviewOpen veterinary journal2025

Organic acids supplementation in poultry nutrition: A review.

Vasko Gerzilov, Pavlina Hristakieva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vasko GerzilovDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agronomy, Agricultural University, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Pavlina HristakievaAgricultural Academy, Agricultural Institute, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poultry industry is continually exploring new feed additives to enhance poultry productivity and health. Since the European Union's (EU) 2006 ban on antibiotics as growth promoters, alternative methods have become essential to support health and growth in livestock production. In response, various strategies have been developed to replace nutritional antibiotics, aiming to combat antibiotic resistance and manage diseases that would otherwise require antibiotic intervention. One promising alternative is the incorporation of organic acids (OAs) and their salts as feed additives in poultry farming. OAs improve feed palatability, reduce pH levels in the gastrointestinal tract of birds, activate digestive enzymes, and inhibit the growth of pathogenic microorganisms while preserving beneficial microflora. These acids enhance metabolism, improve feed digestibility, and accelerate growth. Additionally, OAs support overall bird health, a key factor affecting productivity traits and, consequently, the economic performance and profitability of poultry farming. This article examines the potential applications of OAs in poultry nutrition.

Indexed as

AcidsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietary SupplementsPoultryAnimal HusbandryAnimalsChickensDietAcidsAntibiotic alternativesEgg productionGrowth performanceOrganic acids

Identifiers

PMID41036003
PMCPMC12483471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.