Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035963›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Risk factors for progression of intracranial hemorrhage after initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis: an evaluation of 1390 TBI patients.

Keith Walter Burczak, Jan-Michael Van Gent, Devi Bavishi, Joel James, Thomas W Clements, Thaddeus J Puzio, Bryan A Cotton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keith Walter BurczakThe University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7147-2281
Jan-Michael Van GentDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-2527
Devi BavishiGeneral Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1498-2458
Joel JamesThe University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thomas W ClementsSurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thaddeus J PuzioGeneral Surgery, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4150-5956
Bryan A CottonSurgery, University of Texas John P and Katherine G McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-6742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) often undergo early stability CT scans to evaluate for progression of bleeding. The factors associated with progression after initiating venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis (CP) remain poorly described. This study aimed to determine the rate of and factors associated with ICH progression following CP initiation. Methods: This retrospective observational study included adult (≥16 years) polytrauma patients with blunt or penetrating traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted between September 2016 and December 2021. Progression was defined as a radiographic increase in ICH following VTE CP initiation, determined by neurosurgery or radiology faculty. Postprophylaxis CT scans were obtained based on clinical deterioration. Associated factors, neurosurgical intervention rates, and outcomes were evaluated. Results: Among 1390 included patients, ICH progression occurred in 3% (43) following CP initiation. Patients with progression were older (55 vs 45 years) and had higher injury severity scores (33 vs 27; p<0.05). Rates of pneumonia (49% vs 21%) and sepsis (19% vs 9%) were higher in the progression group (p<0.05). There was no difference between groups in time to prophylaxis initiation (40 vs 38 hours), survival (88% vs 92%), or VTE incidence (0% vs 4%; all p=NS). Factors associated with progression included midline shift (21% vs 6%), subdural hematoma (47% vs 26%), and prior progression on 6-hour stability CT (64% vs 34%; p<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed these findings. Among progression patients, 9% required intervention after CP, with only two requiring craniotomy. Conclusions: ICH progression is rare (3%) after VTE CP initiation. Associated factors align with spontaneous progression, suggesting that ICH progression is independent of early VTE prophylaxis (<48 hours). These findings support the safety of early VTE CP as the standard of care for mitigating VTE risk in TBI patients with TBI. Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective study with up to two negative criteria.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsBrain Injuries, Traumaticintracranial hemorrhageVenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID41035963
PMCPMC12481404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.