ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
Drug discovery for chemotherapeutic resistance based on pathway-responsive gene sets and its application in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chemotherapy response variability in cancer patients necessitates novel strategies targeting chemoresistant populations. While combinatorial regimens show promise through synergistic pharmacological interactions, traditional pathway enrichment methods relying on static gene sets fail to capture drug-induced dynamic transcriptional perturbations. Methods: To address this challenge, we developed the Pathway-Responsive Gene Sets (PRGS) framework to systematically identify chemoresistance-associated pathways and guide therapeutic intervention. Comparative evaluation of three computational strategies (GSEA-like method, Hypergeometric test-based method, Bates test-based method) revealed that the GSEA-like methodology exhibited superior performance, enabling precise identification of drug-induced pathway dysregulation. Results: Key experimental findings demonstrated PRGS's superiority over conventional Pathway Member Gene Sets (PMGS), exhibiting statistical independence ( Discussion: This study establishes a PRGS-based methodological framework that integrates genomic perturbations with precision oncology, demonstrating its capacity to decode resistance mechanisms and guide therapeutic development through dynamic pathway analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.