Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025
Labor Analgesia Initiation with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Techniques: A Prospective Randomized Dose Allocation Study of Ropivacaine.
Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: When compared to the standard epidural technique, the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique is reported to provide quicker onset of labor analgesia and improved quality of analgesia. Recently, the DPE technique was found to lower the effective dose for 90% (ED90) of patients receiving bupivacaine for labor analgesia by 35%. However, key pharmacological differences between bupivacaine and ropivacaine and the effect of a DPE technique on ropivacaine doses have not been studied. Therefore, we aimed to determine the effective dose for 50% (ED50) and ED90 of ropivacaine for labor analgesia in parturients when initiated with the DPE and standard epidural techniques. Methods: Study participants were randomized to receive one of the five doses of ropivacaine (12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 mg) undergoing one of the two epidural techniques (either a DPE or standard epidural technique). A total volume of 20 mL of local anesthetic was administered epidurally. Effective analgesia was defined as the patient reporting an NRS pain score < 3 at 20 minutes following drug administration. The ED50 and ED90 values of epidural ropivacaine for labor analgesia were determined using probit analysis, and comparisons were made using the relative median potency ratio. Results: The ED50 of ropivacaine for initiating labor analgesia using the DPE vs standard epidural techniques was 18.6 mg (95% CI, 16.4 to 21.1 mg) vs 19.2 mg (95% CI, 17.0 to 21.8 mg), respectively. The ED90 values were 30.5 mg (95% CI, 26.6 to 38.3 mg) vs 31.1 mg (95% CI, 27.1 to 39.2 mg), respectively. The relative median potency ratio for ropivacaine with DPE vs standard epidural technique was -0.6 (95% CI, -4.0 to 2.6). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that there is no dose-sparing effect of ropivacaine when using the DPE technique vs a standard epidural technique for labor analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.