ArticleAJPM focus2025
Prevalence and Correlates of Firearm Screening and Counseling in Primary Care in Southeast Michigan.
Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The American College of Physicians recommends firearm screening and safety counseling for high-risk patients, although frequency of practice is unclear. The authors evaluated the prevalence and correlates of firearm screening and counseling during health maintenance exams. Methods: The authors performed a cross-sectional analysis of all health maintenance exams for patients aged ≥18 years at an academic center in Southeast Michigan from September 2021 to February 2022. Primary outcomes included documentation of attempted firearm screening and counseling after positive screens. Multinomial logistic regression models estimated the associations between primary outcomes and patient and clinician characteristics using multilevel modeling to account for interclinic variability. Results: In 27,686 health maintenance exams across 17 clinic sites, attempted screening was documented in 99.8% of visits, principally through routine questionnaires, with positive, negative, or no responses in 15.2%, 48.0%, and 36.8%, respectively. One outlier clinic site documented attempted screening in only 0.9% of health maintenance exams and was excluded. Counseling occurred in 1.1% of positive screens; clinic sites accounted for 36.3% of variability. Counseling was less likely for females (AOR=0.65; 95% CI=0.51, 0.82), patients aged ≥65 years (AOR=0.31; 95% CI=0.21, 0.47), and Asian patients (AOR=0.31; 95% CI=0.16, 0.61) and more likely for internal medicine-pediatrics/family medicine clinicians than internal medicine clinicians (AOR=4.42; 95% CI=1.99, 9.82). Conclusions: Clinicians documented attempted firearm screening in nearly all health maintenance exams but seldom counseling, which varied across sites and was linked to patient sociodemographic characteristics and clinician specialty as opposed to high-risk clinical features such as psychiatric disorder. Findings suggest that training and quality improvement efforts are needed to ensure appropriate risk-based counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.