Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035944›Full record

ArticleAJPM focus2025

Content Analysis of Cannabis Discourses on Twitter/X in the U.S.

Zidian Xie, Runtao Zhou, Qihao Yun, Jianghang Wu, Zhengyuan Wang, Mengmeng Yu, Karen M Wilson, Dongmei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJPM focus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zidian XieClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Runtao ZhouGoergen Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Qihao YunGoergen Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Jianghang WuGoergen Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Zhengyuan WangGoergen Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Mengmeng YuGoergen Institute for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Karen M WilsonClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
Dongmei LiClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Funding

The University of Rochester's Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WILSON, KAREN M., ZAND, MARTIN S · 2016 to 2024
$34.6M
Artificial Intelligence for effective communication to promote vaping cessation on social mediaR01CA285482 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Dongmei Li · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002001NCI NIH HHS R01 CA285482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With the legalization of both medical and recreational cannabis use in many U.S. states, this study aims to explore public perceptions and discussions about cannabis on social media in the U.S. Methods: Twitter (now rebranded as X) data on cannabis were collected between February 2022 and February 2023 using the Twitter/X streaming Application Programming Interface. To assess the attitude of tweets toward cannabis and to determine whether Twitter/X users were cannabis users, human-guided deep-learning models called bidirectional encoder representations from transformers were used. The sex and age of users were inferred using a deep-learning facial recognition algorithm (DeepFace). The Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic model was used to comprehend the discussed topics. Results: Among 2,865,562 unique noncommercial cannabis tweets from the U.S., 648,018 tweets (22.62%) had a positive attitude toward cannabis, 234,202 (8.17%) had a negative attitude, and 1,983,342 (69.21%) had a neutral attitude. Among 821,451 unique Twitter/X users, 348,795 (42.46%) were potential cannabis users. The U.S. states allowing recreational cannabis use had 12.19 Twitter/X and cannabis users per 10,000 population, compared to 7.22 users in states without it; however, the difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: This study provides a detailed overview of public perceptions of cannabis in the U.S., aiding policymakers and public health authorities in developing effective regulatory policies about cannabis.

Indexed as

cannabiscontent analysisdeep learningMarijuanaTwitter/X

Identifiers

PMID41035944
PMCPMC12480873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.