Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035927›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Decomposing Medicare total, Part D, and Part B drug payments among people with Alzheimer's disease and related diseases.

Jie Chen, Seyeon Jang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie ChenDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.
Seyeon JangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0826-6530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to examine the extent to which health status, socioeconomic characteristics, and access to needed medications contribute to differences in total Medicare costs and drug spending among beneficiaries with and without Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD). Methods: We used Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) claims data from 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022, linked with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey, to examine factors associated with total Medicare spending, Part D drug spending, and Part B drug costs. Decomposition analysis was conducted to quantify the contribution of individual characteristics to observed cost differences by ADRD status. Results: Our model explained 48% of the total Medicare spending difference and 80% of the Part D drug cost gap between beneficiaries with and without ADRD. Depression, heart disease, self-reported poor health, and functional limitations were major contributors to total spending differences. Dual eligibility was a primary driver of higher Part D costs. However, the model did not adequately explain differences in Part B drug costs. Conclusion: These findings underscore the need for targeted interventions in mental health, cardiovascular care, and pharmaceutical policy. Further research is needed to better understand unmeasured drivers of Medicare spending, especially physician-administered drug costs under Part B, among beneficiaries with ADRD.

Indexed as

ADRDCAHPSdecompositiondepressiondual eligibilityfee for serviceheart diseaseMedicare spendingPart BPart D

Identifiers

PMID41035927
PMCPMC12482227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.