ArticleGastroenterology report2025
A randomized controlled trial of trans-intersphincteric double seton (TRISDS) for the treatment of perianal abscess.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Incision and drainage (I&D) for perianal abscesses is associated with high rates of fistula formation. Our study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel technique, trans-intersphincteric double seton (TRISDS), designed to preserve anal sphincter integrity and improve clinical outcomes compared to I&D. Methods: This prospective, randomized, non-blinded controlled study included adult patients with perianal abscesses located below the levator ani muscle with an internal opening. Patients were randomly assigned to either the TRISDS group ( Results: The TRISDS group achieved a significantly higher cure rate of 78.2% (43/55) compared to 41.2% (21/51) in the I&D group ( Conclusions: The study highlighted the effectiveness of TRISDS in improving cure rate without compromising anal function. The TRISDS technique represents a promising strategy for the treatment of perianal abscesses. Further multicenter studies are recommended to validate these findings and expand the application of TRISDS in diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.