SynthesisFrontiers in microbiology2025
Bibliometric analysis of the application of artificial intelligence techniques in bacteriology: a PRISMA-guided research agenda.
Synthesis in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in pediatrics: a bibliometric analysis of global output, networks, and frontiers [2016-2025].Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into bacteriology has marked a pivotal advancement by enabling the analysis of large-scale microbiological datasets. Despite growing adoption, significant research gaps persist, hindering the full exploitation of AI's potential in bacterial research and diagnostics. Objective: To analyze global scientific production on the application of AI techniques in bacteriology and propose a future research agenda based on bibliometric trends. Methods: This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in bacteriology, explicitly guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework. Unlike traditional reviews, this approach combines PRISMA's methodological rigor with bibliometric techniques to map scientific production. Metadata were retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science using predefined search strategies. Quantitative indicators, co-occurrence networks, and thematic mapping were applied to examine the field's temporal evolution and conceptual structure. The findings provide an evidence-based overview of research trends and gaps, supporting the design of a future research agenda on AI integration in bacteriology. Results: The findings reveal exponential growth in scientific output, especially between 2022 and 2024. Leading authors include Singh and Waegeman, with high-impact journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology and MSystems. The United States and China are the most productive countries. Thematic evolution shows a shift from early topics like microbial spoilage toward advanced applications including bacterial classification and diagnostic modeling. Key conceptual clusters were identified around microbiomes, classification, and bioinformatics. Emerging terms such as "diagnosis," "metagenomics," and "transfer learning" indicate future research directions. Conclusion: AI applications in bacteriology are expanding rapidly yet still rely heavily on traditional machine learning methods. There is a need to incorporate advanced approaches such as deep learning and transformer-based models. The findings support a strategic agenda for promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and technological innovation in bacteriological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.