ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Symptom clusters in inflammatory bowel disease: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing gastrointestinal disorder with a high symptom burden. Patients often report multiple concurrent symptoms, yet most studies have examined them individually. Symptom clusters-defined as groups of co-occurring and interrelated symptoms-provide a framework for understanding this complexity. Evidence on IBD-specific clusters, however, remains fragmented and inconsistent. Methods: We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework to synthesize findings on IBD symptom cluster types, assessment instruments, associated factors, and dynamic trajectories. Searches covered database inception through 31 October 2024. Results: Thirteen studies were included, identifying 29 symptom clusters. Marked heterogeneity and overlap were observed. To integrate findings, clusters were categorized into five groups: gastrointestinal/physical, psychological, systemic/fatigue, nutritional/appetite-related, and mixed/trajectory-related. Assessment instruments varied considerably, most lacking IBD-specific validation. Reported associated factors included demographic, clinical, and treatment variables, but results were inconsistent. Few studies addressed longitudinal changes or interactions among clusters. Conclusion: Research on IBD symptom clusters remains limited and heterogeneous. Standardized definitions and validated tools are urgently needed. Most existing studies did not stratify findings by disease subtype, although limited evidence indicates that UC and CD appear to exhibit distinct clustering patterns. Future studies should adopt longitudinal and biomarker-informed designs, and examine interactions among clusters, to improve clinical management and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.