ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Sickle cell disease: suspect, check, diagnose-practical tips for non-SCD experts to suspect and diagnose SCD in low-prevalence European settings.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common monogenic disorder, including a group of autosomal recessive hemoglobinopathies characterized by hemoglobin polymerization and sickling of red blood cells when low oxygen concentrations are present. SCD has a growing public health significance, affecting nearly 8 million people globally, with a high prevalence observed in Sub-Saharan Africa and Mediterranean countries. Improved understanding of SCD is essential, particularly given recent migratory flows that have contributed to an increase in the number of affected individuals in Europe and Italy. An early diagnosis is crucial to start the appropriate therapy to ensure the patients with the best outcome and improved quality of life, but clinical signs of SCD are often not easily recognized as symptoms are nonspecific and difficult to frame within the context of a congenital hemolytic disease. Given the availability of simple and multiple diagnostic tools, a simplified approach based on red-flags can facilitate the diagnostic suspicion in clinical practice to promptly identify individuals to be referred to specialized centers. The present narrative review aims to discuss the main clinical features, diagnostic tools of SCD, and provide practical illness scripts to facilitate the approach of non SCD-expert healthcare professionals to its diagnosis. Patient's history, including ethnicity, region of origin, familial cases of SCD and other congenital or unexplained anemias, previous clinical manifestations, remain fundamental in guiding diagnostic suspicion of SCD, together with a few crucial lab parameters. The implementation of screening projects is essential to ensure early diagnosis and rapid access to care for affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.