Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2025

Scents modulate anxiety levels, but electroencephalographic and electrocardiographic assessments could diverge from subjective reports: a pilot study.

Marina Morozova, Irina Gabrielyan, Daria Kleeva, Victoria Efimova, Mikhail Lebedev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marina MorozovaCenter for Neurocognitive Research (MEG Center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Moscow, Russia.
Irina GabrielyanPeoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia.
Daria KleevaMSU Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Victoria EfimovaHerzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Mikhail LebedevResearch Center in the Field of Artificial Intelligence, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scents can influence anxiety, including that experienced in clinical environments. This study examined the effects of two distinct aromas: lavender, a fragrance widely recognized for its calming properties, and African stone, a musky and relatively unfamiliar scent. Twenty healthy participants underwent alternating periods of rest and scent inhalation in a dental office environment while anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), electroencephalographic (EEG) measures of theta, alpha, and beta power ratios, and electrocardiographic (ECG) measures of heart rate variability (HRV). Lavender inhalation significantly reduced self-reported state anxiety scores but did not produce measurable changes in EEG or HRV indices, possibly due to the short (5 min) exposure duration. African stone, in contrast, did not alter self-reported anxiety but induced significant physiological effects, including reduced theta and, increased alpha power in parieto-occipital regions, and decreased high-frequency (HF) and total HRV power. While the EEG changes are consistent with a more relaxed state, the HRV reductions could indicate a heightened autonomic arousal, suggesting that African stone could have triggered increased attention and physiological activation rather than merely relaxation. These findings demonstrate a divergence between subjective and physiological responses to scent exposure. Lavender appears to primarily reduce perceived anxiety, while African stone influences physiological arousal. We suggest that a multimodal approach be applied in aromatherapy research.

Indexed as

anxietyaromatherapydentistryEEGHRVhyraceumlavenderSTAI

Identifiers

PMID41035860
PMCPMC12479437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.