ArticleSexual medicine2025
Labia majora lifting technique with polydioxanone threads.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Polydioxanone (PDO) thread is a synthetic absorbable surgical suture used for rejuvenation and lifting. Aim: The aim of this study is to use PDO threads for rejuvenation and enlargement effect in patients with labium majus hypotrophy. Methods: Twenty-one patients with labia majora hypotrophy were included in the study. Conventionally, surgery, fat filling or hyaluronic acid filling is used for labia majora rejuvenation. In this study, a different technique, the PDO thread suspension technique, was applied. For PDO thread, Hyundae Meditech Co.Ltd's Secret Line Up product containing 50 mm screw thread with 30 G-38 mm needle tip was used. It was planned to use 10 PDO threads for right and left labia majora. After a total of 20 needles were inserted, the needles were removed one by one and the PDO threads remained in the subcutaneous superficial layer and the procedure was terminated 5 min later. Preoperative and postoperative the Female Genital Self-Image Scale (FGSIS) scores of the patients were compared. Outcomes: The overall FGSIS total score demonstrated a significant increase following the intervention. Results: The FGSIS total mean score in the preoperative period was increased in the postoperative period. This difference was statistically significant. Moreover, the mean score calculated for each parameter of FGSIS in the preoperative period increased significantly in the postoperative period. Clinical Implications: These findings indicate a favorable safety profile for the use of PDO threads in this clinical context. Strengths and Limitations: The strength of the study is to introduce a minimally invasive and effective method for labia majora lifting, on the other hand, the small number of patients in the study, limitation of the study. Conclusion: We would like to point out that in this study, we evaluated labium majus rejuvenation from the same perspective, based on the shaping and enlargement of genital appearance and its positive effect on self-confidence and increase in sexual functions. Unlike many labium majus rejuvenation procedures, this less invasive procedure has achieved similar results. In this context, it is a preferable alternative to surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.