Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035808›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Spectrum of Urological Surgeries in a Nigerian Specialist Hospital: A Three-Year Review.

Ifeanyichukwu E Ihedoro, Paul E Ngwu, Chibueze P Ohiarah, Enyinnanya V Onyemachi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ifeanyichukwu E IhedoroUrology, Eleos Specialist Hospital, Umuahia, NGA.
Paul E NgwuUrology, Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Umuahia, NGA.
Chibueze P OhiarahSurgery, Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Umuahia, NGA.
Enyinnanya V OnyemachiUrology, Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Umuahia, NGA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrology deals with the management of medical conditions affecting the male genitourinary tract and the female urinary tract. A wide range of procedures may be performed in the management of these diseases. The aim of this study is to analyze the indications for urological procedures performed in a urology specialist hospital, with a view to providing vital data that can be used as a policy framework for healthcare development in the country.

methodsThe records of patients who underwent urological procedures between January 2022 and December 2024 were retrieved from the hospital's Medical Records Department. Vital information retrieved from case files was analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 29; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY).

resultsA total of 1,253 urological procedures were done between the years under review. This comprises 1,086 males (86.7%) and 167 females (13.3%). The mean age of participants was 61.3±15.7 years. The three most common indications for surgery were benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (29.9%), renal/ureteric calculi (22%), and suspected prostate cancer (9.7%). The most common procedures performed were transurethral resection of the prostate/bipolar enucleation of the prostate (27.1%), laser lithotripsy (15.3%), and prostate biopsy (9.7%). Additionally, 65.5% of the procedures were minimally invasive, 71.8% of them were performed under regional anaesthesia, 67.1% of the patients required inpatient stay, and 94.1% were elective cases.

conclusionMost of the surgeries were performed endoscopically, mainly for BPH and urolithiasis.

Indexed as

minimally invasivenigeriaproceduresurgeryurology

Identifiers

PMID41035808
PMCPMC12481000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.