Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035798›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025

Promoting motor recovery after stroke using cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation.

Domiziana Falaschi, Charlotte Stagg, Alejandra Sel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Domiziana FalaschiCentre for Brain Science, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Charlotte StaggWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, FMRIB, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, FMRIB Building, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
Alejandra SelCentre for Brain Science, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the most prevalent neurological disorder, the primary cause of long-term disability, and the second leading cause of mortality. Post-stroke motor symptoms critically impact and limit stroke survivors' quality of life. Rehabilitation aims to restore motor function by promoting neuroplasticity and neuronal reorganisation. A promising therapeutic approach involves combining non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) with activity-based training to enhance neuroplasticity. NIBS are thought to promote the innate neuronal reorganisation of the functionally relevant networks after a stroke. Amongst NIBS techniques, a pioneering method, often referred to as cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS), allows to enhance neuroplasticity in cortical networks. Unlike traditional approaches, ccPAS enables the manipulation of interregional connectivity within specific cortical pathways. In particular, ccPAS can promote synaptic plasticity and connectivity in a functionally relevant cortico-cortical route tailoring the interventions to individual lesion-specific network alterations. In this viewpoint, we propose and critically evaluate the use of ccPAS as a therapeutic tool using upper-limb motor rehabilitation as a primary example, highlighting its potential for post-stroke recovery. We summarise the limited and contrasting evidence supporting the use of ccPAS after a stroke and make suggestions to overcome the current limitations emphasising the need for further future research.

Indexed as

Cortico-cortical paired associative stimulationNeuroplasticityStrokeTranscranial magnetic stimulationUpper limb motor rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41035798
PMCPMC12481022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.