Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035797›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

The effect of focused lung ultrasound on antibiotic prescribing in patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections in Danish general practice (PLUS-FLUS): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, post-market trial.

Julie Jepsen Strøm, Camilla Aakjær Andersen, Martin Bach Jensen, Janus Laust Thomsen, Christian B Laursen, Søren Helbo Skaarup, Hans Henrik Lawaetz Schultz, Malene Plejdrup Hansen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06210282 (The Effect of Focused Lung Ultrasonography on Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients With Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Danish General Practice), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06210282 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Focused Lung Ultrasonography on Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients With Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Danish General Practice: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled391ConditionsLower Respiratory Tract Infection, Community Acquired PneumoniaArmsFocused lung ultrasound (FLUS), Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julie Jepsen StrømCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Camilla Aakjær AndersenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Martin Bach JensenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Janus Laust ThomsenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christian B LaursenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Søren Helbo SkaarupDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Hans Henrik Lawaetz SchultzDepartment of Cardiology, Section for Lung Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malene Plejdrup HansenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global concern. Antibiotic use is the main driver and rational use is essential. General practitioners (GPs) prescribe most antibiotics for patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). This trial assessed whether focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) added to usual care in general practice could reduce antibiotic prescribing at the index consultation. Methods: In this pragmatic, randomised, post-market, superiority trial, adults presenting with acute cough and at least one other symptom of acute LRTI, in whom the GP suspected pneumonia, were invited to participate. 34 GPs across 28 Danish office-based general practice clinics recruited participants. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1, stratified by GP, to receive either usual care (controls), reflecting current standard examination and care, or usual care supplemented with FLUS. The primary outcome was the proportion and relative risk (RR) of patients having antibiotics prescribed at the index consultation. Outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. All patients were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06210282). Findings: Between November 1, 2023, and July 10, 2024, 390 patients were enrolled and analysed; 192 were assigned to the FLUS group. In the usual care group (n = 198), 81 patients (41%) were prescribed antibiotics at the index consultation compared with 69 (36%) in the FLUS group (n = 192; RR 0·88, 95% CI: 0·68-1·14). No evidence of harm was identified with the addition of FLUS to usual care. Interpretation: Addition of FLUS did not lead to a 15% or larger reduction in antibiotic prescribing at the index consultation. Routine implementation of FLUS in this patient population is not supported by the findings. However, no evidence of harm was observed with the addition of FLUS. Funding: The Health Foundation, The Foundation for General Practice, The Lung Association's Research Fund, and regional committees for Quality and Education.

Indexed as

Anti-bacterial AgentsGeneral practicePragmatic clinical trialRespiratory tract infectionUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID41035797
PMCPMC12481102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.