ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2025
Identification of priority practice areas for evidence-based care in congenital heart Disease: An exploratory Survey of non-medical healthcare professionals affiliated with the Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transition from Paediatric to Adult Care in Congenital Heart Disease: A Call for Action.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: s Identifying priority areas of nursing practice for individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) is essential to address evolving care needs and support professional development. However, standardized criteria to guide such prioritization remain limited. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted between April and September 2024 using an online survey distributed to all nurse members of the Italian Society of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Diseases (SICPED). Sixteen CHD-related practice areas and five prioritization criteria were defined through literature review and expert consultation. Participants rated each area on a 5-point Likert scale according to the five criteria. Results: A total of 78 nurses completed the survey. Among the criteria, the absence of clinical guidelines (mean = 4.04 ± 0.98) and the required level of professional competence (mean = 3.95 ± 1.24) received the highest scores. Mixed ANOVA revealed significant variability in scores across practice areas and criteria (F(48) = 2.385, p < .001). Four areas emerged as priority domains across multiple criteria: psychosocial and emotional support for individuals with CHD and their families, management of neonatal opioid withdrawal, palliative and end-of-life care, and the transition of adolescents with CHD to adult services. Conclusions: This study provides a structured foundation for identifying nursing practice priorities in the care of individuals with CHD. These findings may guide the development of interdisciplinary strategies, clinical guidelines, and professional training initiatives within communities of practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.