ArticleClinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH2025
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Benzodiazepine Use in Patients Attending a Community Mental Health Team in Scotland: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Article in Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to assess the point prevalence and associated factors of Benzodiazepine (BZD) use in patients attending a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) in Scotland. Methods: This cross-sectional survey included 412 patients from the outpatient medical caseload over a three-month period in 2021. Patient records were reviewed to identify whether they were prescribed BZDs. The analysis aimed to determine the point prevalence rate of BZD use and compare characteristics between patients on and not on BZDs. Results: The point prevalence rate was 16%. There were no significant sex differences (p=0.10) between patients on and not on BZDs. However, statistically significant differences were observed in relation to age (p=0.003), primary diagnosis (p=0.03), and the number of psychotropic medications (p= <0.001). Only the number of psychotropic medications varied significantly between long and short-term BZD use (p=0.005). Those on long-term BZD use of one year or longer had a higher number of psychotropic medications. Discussion: Monitoring and comparing the prevalence rates of BZD prescription by CMHTs is essential for reducing adverse effects associated with BZDs. Such concerns can influence clinical practice and may sometimes lead to conflicts between secondary and primary care clinicians. This study involved only one CMHT in Scotland and, therefore, may not be fully representative of all CMHTs across the country. Conclusion: A high number of psychotropic medications emerged as the only statistically significant factor associated with long-term BZD use. Consequently, diligent monitoring of BZD use is warranted in patients on a high number of psychotropic medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.