ArticleEJHaem2025
Results From a UK Consensus via Delphi on Practical Considerations Surrounding Risk Assessment and Patient Monitoring for a Prompt Diagnosis of Severe Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD) in Adults Post-HSCT.
Article in EJHaem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a life-threatening complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The diagnosis remains challenging, with under recognition of the initial signs and symptoms potentially resulting in delayed diagnoses. The aim of this Delphi study is to establish a consensus regarding the optimal risk assessment and onward care of patients with VOD. Methods: The process employed a modified Delphi methodology. A steering group of six VOD experts working in the United Kingdom attended a virtual meeting in September 2023, developed 44 statements for testing. Respondents were offered a four-point Likert scale to indicate their level of agreement with each statement. Results: A total of 70 responses were received from healthcare providers working in the area of haematology and oncology in the United Kingdom. All statements achieved consensus. Overall, 82% of statements achieved ≥ 90% ( Conclusion: This modified Delphi process achieved consensus across all statements, allowing for a set of recommendations to be developed to support a consistent approach across the United Kingdom for the risk assessment and patient monitoring procedures for VOD post-HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.