ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
An interpretable machine learning model using multimodal pretreatment features predicts pathological complete response to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Genomic Data Analysis: New Frontiers in Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Machine learning applications in the detection and treatment of esophageal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Development of a predictive model for pathological complete response following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Deep learning models based on CT predict prognosis in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Predicting the Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting sepsis risk in ICU patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: development and validation using the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has revolutionized the management of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the inability to accurately predict pathological complete response (pCR) remains a major barrier to treatment personalization. We aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model using pretreatment multimodal features to predict pCR prior to nICT initiation. Methods: In this retrospective study, 114 ESCC patients receiving nICT were randomly allocated into training (n=81) and validation (n=33) cohorts (7:3 ratio). Predictors of pCR were identified from pretreatment clinical variables, endoscopic ultrasonography, and hematological biomarkers via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Eight machine learning algorithms were implemented to construct prediction models. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) provided feature importance and model interpretability. Results: Following feature selection, 17 variables were incorporated into model construction. The Random Forest (RF) model demonstrated perfect discrimination in the training cohort (AUC = 1.000, sensitivity = 1.000, specificity = 1.000, PPV = 1.000, NPV = 1.000), while maintaining robust predictive ability in the independent validation cohort (AUC = 0.913, sensitivity = 0.733, specificity = 0.889, PPV = 0.846, NPV = 0.800). Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed favorable clinical utility. SHAP analysis identified alcohol consumption, circumferential involvement ≥50%, elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as the key contributors to pCR prediction. Conclusions: We established a clinically applicable, interpretable ML model that accurately predicts pCR to nICT in ESCC by integrating multimodal pretreatment data. This tool may optimize patient selection for nICT and advance precision therapy paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.