Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035589›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Global Survey on General Surgery Resident Involvement in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

Adam Abu-Abeid, Wah Yang, Jonathan B Yuval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam Abu-AbeidDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, ISR.
Wah YangDepartment of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, CHN.
Jonathan B YuvalDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, ISR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited global information on the involvement and autonomy of general surgery residents in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS).

methodsWe conducted an international online survey from July 15 to September 15, 2024, assessing residents' participation in MBS procedures, outpatient clinics, simulation courses, mentorship, and research. The 40-question survey was distributed via social media, email lists, and the Global Obesity Collaborative Group.

resultsA total of 198 general surgery residents from all continents participated, primarily from Europe (51%), Asia-Pacific (22%), and Latin America (13%). The mean age was 34.0 ± 6.7 years, and 31% were women. The average postgraduate year was 4.11 ± 3.22 years. Most respondents (68%) intended to pursue an MBS fellowship. One-third lacked MBS services at their institution. However, 83% reported acting as primary surgeons, primarily in sleeve gastrectomy (47%), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (25%), and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (22%). Additionally, 71% participated in outpatient MBS-related clinics. Mentorship was common (81%), with 49% mentored by an MBS surgeon. Research engagement was high, with 85% publishing at least one article, 45% in MBS, and 30% presenting at international conferences. MBS-dedicated services and high-volume centers were more frequent in North and Latin America and less common in other regions.

conclusionsThis is the largest international survey on general surgery residents' involvement in MBS. These findings provide insight into global training practices and highlight the need for improved exposure to MBS worldwide.

Indexed as

bariatric surgeryinternational surveymetabolic surgeryresidentstraining

Identifiers

PMID41035589
PMCPMC12481622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.