ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Blood glucose upon return of spontaneous circulation and neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To elucidate the association between blood glucose levels at the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and neurological outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), a post hoc analysis was conducted using data from a prospective observational study involving 41 hospitals in Tokyo and its suburbs from 2019 to 2021. Adults with nontraumatic OHCA who achieved ROSC were included. Methods: A total of 1533 patients were analyzed. A spline curve for estimating neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category score ≤2 at 30 days) by blood glucose level at ROSC was generated. Patients were classified into low, moderate, and high blood glucose groups, defined as <100, 100-300, and ≥300 mg/dL, respectively. Neurological outcomes were compared using generalized estimating equations adjusted for patient and institutional characteristics. Results: Favorable neurologic outcomes were fewer in the low and high blood glucose groups than in the moderate group (8/132 [6.1 %] and 62/485 [12.8 %] vs. 181/807 [22.4 %]). The adjusted model revealed that low and high glucose levels at ROSC were associated with fewer favorable outcomes (odds ratios, 0.43 [0.18-0.96] and 0.59 [0.42-0.84]). High blood glucose levels showed unfavorable effects in subgroups with cardiogenic or noncardiogenic etiology, age <65 years, and low-flow time ≤30 min, whereas low blood glucose levels showed unfavorable effects only in cardiogenic cases. Conclusions: Blood glucose levels <100 and ≥300 mg/dL were associated with unfavorable neurological outcomes, with a nonlinear inverted U-shaped relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.