ArticleResuscitation plus2025
Influence of esophageal temperature probe tip placement on core temperature measurement accuracy in cold environments: a randomized crossover trial with implications for cardiac arrest management.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07574736 (ESOTIP-TEE), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ESOTIP-TEE: Defining an Easy Landmark to Guide Correct Esophageal Probe Placement With Transesophageal Echocardiography
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate core temperature (CT) measurement is critical for staging and management in accidental hypothermia, particularly in cardiac arrest, where it guides extracorporeal rewarming decisions. Esophageal temperature monitoring is considered the reference method in the prehospital setting in patients with a secured airway, provided the probe tip is positioned in the distal third of the esophagus behind the heart. However, the effect of proximal misplacement on measurement accuracy remains unknown. We hypothesized that a probe tip positioned behind the trachea would yield falsely low readings during cold air exposure. Methods: In this randomized crossover study (May 2024 at Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy), healthy volunteers underwent nasal esophageal probe placement using a height-based formula. Two probe positions were defined via posteroanterior chest radiographs: correct (behind the heart) and incorrect (5 cm above the tracheal bifurcation). Participants were exposed to -20 °C for 20 min in a climate chamber, once with the probe in the correct and once in the incorrect position, in randomized order, separated by a washout period. Results: Fifteen participants (7 male, 8 female) completed the study. Mean correct insertion depth was 41.1 (2.5) cm for males and 39.3 (1.5) cm for females. At baseline and throughout -20 °C exposure, mean CT was on average 0.6 °C lower when the probe was incorrectly positioned. Temperature fluctuations were also greater with proximal misplacement. Conclusion: Proximal misplacement of esophageal probes during cold air exposure results in falsely low and more variable CT readings. This may critically affect triage and treatment, particularly in hypothermic cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.