Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035567›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025

Perinatal outcomes after increased fetal movement as counted by a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder.

Eiji Ryo, Hideo Kamata, Keita Yatsuki, Takashi Kosaka, Kazunori Nagasaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eiji RyoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan.
Hideo KamataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan.
Keita YatsukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan.
Takashi KosakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan.
Kazunori NagasakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teikyo University, School of Medicine, 2-11-1, Kaga, Itabashi, Tokyo 173-8606, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is no consensus in perinatal medicine about what increased fetal movement means. Objective: Our purpose was to study the relationship between perinatal outcomes and an increase in gross fetal movement as counted by an objective method. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study. A total of 471 pregnant women recorded fetal movement with a fetal movement acceleration measurement recorder at night weekly after 28 weeks. The ratio of 10-second epochs with fetal movement to all epochs was calculated as a fetal movement parameter when movement could be recorded for more than 4 h on one night. If the parameter was above the 90th percentile on the previously made reference curve, it was defined as increased movement. Women who showed the increased fetal movement at least once were classified into a study group, and the other women were classified into a control group. Perinatal abnormalities between the two groups were compared with the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Results: A total of 13,931 h were recorded from 390 women, including 74 and 316 women, respectively, in the study and control groups. There were fewer preterm births (1.4 %), non-cephalic presentations at delivery (0 %), and Cesarean deliveries (25.7 %) in the study group than in the control group (15.5 %, 6.0 %, and 39.9 %; p = 0.0003, 0.031, and 0.024, respectively). There were no significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes. Conclusion: An increase in long-term gross fetal movement has a protective effect against preterm birth, non-cephalic presentation at birth, and Cesarean delivery.

Indexed as

Fetal movement acceleration measurement recorderFetal non-cephalic presentationFMAM recorderGross fetal movementIntrauterine fetal deathPerinatal abnormalityPreterm delivery

Identifiers

PMID41035567
PMCPMC12482633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.