ArticleGenetics in medicine open2025
Assessing completeness of cancer family history in EHRs using genetically defined kinships: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Genetics in medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Family history (FHx) is the most widely available tool for reducing mortality and morbidity caused by heritable diseases. However, FHx may be inadequately documented. Our objective was to assess the rate at which cancers in patient relatives are documented as FHx in electronic health records (EHRs). Methods: Our primary analysis included 903 Healthy Nevada Project participants who had cancer-diagnosed patient relatives removed by ≤2 degrees in a kinship analysis. The rate of successful EHR documentation of relatives' cancer type was quantified using generalized estimating equations. Results: The population-average rate of cancer FHx documentation in the EHR was 45.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 42.0%-48.4%). The odds ratio (OR) for successful documentation was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.24-0.64) for patients >69 years old versus patients <30 years old. Additionally, FHx documentation increased with years since a relative's cancer diagnosis, with an OR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.57-3.06) for patients with ≥10 years since their relative's diagnosis versus <5 years. Compared with females, males were less likely to document female-specific cancers (OR 0.31 [95% CI: 0.19-0.49]) but more likely to document male-specific cancers (OR 2.42 [95% CI: 1.16-5.04]). In a secondary analysis of 83 patients with variants in Conclusion: More than half of cancers affecting patient relatives were not documented as FHx in patient EHRs. This suggests that familial risk is underestimated, likely resulting in missed opportunities to reduce cancer mortality and morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.