Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035500›Full record

ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2025

Evaluating the potential of the outcome-oriented nursing assessment for acute care (ePA-AC) to identify cardiovascular patients at risk for unplanned 30- and 180-day all-cause readmission: Development and validation of a routine data-based model.

Gabriela Schmid-Mohler, Tobias Spiller, Tudor Jumuga, Ulrike Held, Annina Cincera, Heidi Petry, Jutta Ernst, Matthias Hermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriela Schmid-MohlerCenter of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Tobias SpillerDepartment of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Tudor JumugaEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Ulrike HeldEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Annina CinceraEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Department of Biostatistics, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Heidi PetryCenter of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Jutta ErnstCenter of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zuerich, Switzerland.
Matthias HermannUniversity Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zuerich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rehospitalisation rates in patients with cardiovascular diseases are high. Routine data - including nursing data - might help identify patients at risk. Objective: To evaluate the potential predictive value of routinely collected inpatient data and nursing assessment (ePA-AC) scores to identify cardiovascular inpatients at risk of unplanned 30- and 180-day all-cause rehospitalisation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients hospitalised ≥48 h in the cardiology department from December 2012 - June 2022. The sample was divided into derivation and validation sets based on time of first hospitalisation. Logistic regression and multiple Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were applied. Results: The derivation dataset included 6049 patients, the validation set 1005. Of these 7054 patients, 505 (7.2 %) experienced unplanned all-cause rehospitalisation within 30 days and 1186 (16.81 %) within 180 days post-discharge. The ROC's area under the curve (AUC) values for the 30-day logistic regression model and 180-day Cox regression model were respectively 0.61 and 0.65. Both models identified two key risk factors: ≥1 emergency department visit in the past year (OR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.18-1.86, HR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.52-2.00); and use of coumarin (OR 1.47, 95 %-CI 1.12-1.90, HR 1.27, 95 % CI 1.08-1.50). From the ePA-AC, chronic pain (HR 1.48, 95 %-CI 1.14-1.91) and acute breathing problems (HR 1.41, 95 %-CI 1.03-1.94) were risk factors for 180-day but not 30-day rehospitalisation. Conclusion: Both models demonstrated low to moderate predictive value. From the ePA-AC variables, only pain and breathing problems were predictive for unplanned all-cause 180-day rehospitalisations.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesClinical decision rulesForecastingHeart diseasesHospitalisationNursing assessmentProbability learningStatistical models

Identifiers

PMID41035500
PMCPMC12481098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.