ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Development of an Evidence-Based and Theory-Informed Self-Management Intervention for People with Lipoedema: An Intervention Mapping Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The etiology of lipoedema remains unclear, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. Current treatment primarily consists of general lifestyle recommendations, with effective self-management being essential for integrating these recommendations into daily life. However, no self-management interventions currently address the unique needs of people with lipoedema. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based, theory-informed intervention to enhance self-management in people with lipoedema using the Intervention Mapping (IM) approach. Methods: Following the first four steps of the IM approach, this study used a participatory methodology involving stakeholders, empirical data, and theory. Steps included: 1) needs assessment; 2) identification of outcomes, performance objectives, and change objectives; 3) selection of behavioural change methods; and 4) development of program components. Results: The resulting intervention includes a program for people with lipoedema and a training program for healthcare professionals (HCPs). The intervention aims to empower patients to engage in self-management and equip HCPs to provide effective support. Key determinants targeted include self-efficacy, self-regulation skills, knowledge, attitudes, and social facilitation. The program for people with lipoedema consists of seven themes aligned with self-management behaviours and is delivered through 19 sessions: seven one-on-one sessions, one session involving supportive individuals, and 11 group sessions. The program for HCPs is delivered through six group sessions, each focusing on the core skills HCPs need to effectively deliver self-management support to their patients. Conclusion: The IM approach effectively guided a systematic, transparent, and reproducible development process. Grounded in established theories and behavioural change methods, the intervention provides a strong foundation for implementation and evaluation among people with lipoedema. The fifth and sixth steps of IM are considered future priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.