Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035438›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

No relationship between gender stereotypes and mental rotation in preschool girls.

W Miro Ebert, Leonardo Jost, Petra Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W Miro EbertFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Leonardo JostFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Petra JansenFaculty of Human Sciences, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender stereotypes about spatial ability have been proposed as a contributing factor to the gender gap in STEM. This goal of this study was to investigate whether implicit gender stereotypes regarding spatial ability are associated with mental rotation (MR) performance in preschool-aged girls, and whether visuospatial working memory (VSWM) plays a moderating role. Fifty-two girls aged 5 to 6.75 years completed a chronometric MR task, a computerized Corsi block-tapping task (assessing VSWM), and a single-target Implicit Association Test measuring associations between gender and toys used in spatial play. Participants did not show significant implicit stereotypes favoring either gender. Contrary to our hypotheses, no evidence for a relationship between implicit stereotypes and MR response times was found. Unexpectedly, stronger implicit associations linking boys with spatial ability were associated with higher MR accuracy. VSWM was positively correlated with both MR accuracy and implicit stereotype scores. Since the hypothesized relationship between implicit stereotypes and MR was not observed, a potential moderation through VSWM was not examined. Our findings diverge from prior research suggesting that stereotype-consistent associations in girls are linked to lower spatial task performance. Taken together, the results cast doubt on the robustness of implicit gender stereotypes about spatial ability in early childhood and highlight the complexity of their potential impact on spatial cognition. Further research is needed to clarify under what conditions, if any, such stereotypes affect performance in young children.

Indexed as

childrengender stereotypeshuman sex differenceskindergartenmental rotationpreschoolspatial ability

Identifiers

PMID41035438
PMCPMC12481608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.