ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Retinal Perfusion and Injury in Sepsis and after Major Surgery.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extending the frontier of tissue perfusion to monitoring the microcirculation.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErrata.2026
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Assess retinal perfusion in sepsis, compared with uncomplicated postoperative care and healthy controls, and assess the effects of reduced perfusion on retinal structure and visual function. Design: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study between March 2018 and December 2022, with follow-up measures collected 3 to 6 months after discharge. Subjects: Twenty-four patients with sepsis were assessed in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 3 to 6 months later, 45 ICU control patients assessed during elective ICU admission after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, preoperatively, and 3 to 6 months later, and 15 healthy controls. Testing: Assessments included retinal layer thickness using OCT, retinal perfusion using OCT angiography, and visual function using Humphrey visual field analysis. Organ dysfunction was assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring. Main Outcome Measures: Superficial vascular plexus (SVP) retinal perfusion, OCT retinal ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness, and mean deviation (MD) on Humphrey visual field testing were evaluated. Results: Superficial vascular plexus retinal perfusion was 37.4% lower in patients with sepsis compared with ICU control patients ( Conclusions: Retinal perfusion was impaired in patients with sepsis compared with both healthy controls and patients after major surgery. It was moderately associated with other measures of organ dysfunction assessed by SOFA. Reduced retinal perfusion in both patients with sepsis and patients after major surgery is strongly associated with subsequent GCL thickening and less strongly associated with decreased visual field MD, suggesting reduced retinal perfusion is associated with retinal damage, with consequent visual dysfunction. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.