Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035436›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Retinal Perfusion and Injury in Sepsis and after Major Surgery.

Ella Courtie, Gagana Mallawaarachchi, Aditya U Kale, Ahmed Gilani, Nicholas Capewell, Donna Holding, Benjamin T K Hui, Xiaoxuan Liu, Elinor Laws, Ann Logan and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ella CourtieNeuroscience and Ophthalmology Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gagana MallawaarachchiUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Aditya U KaleUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Ahmed GilaniInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicholas CapewellUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Donna HoldingUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Benjamin T K HuiOphthalmology Department, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Xiaoxuan LiuUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.
Elinor LawsNeuroscience and Ophthalmology Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ann LoganAxolotl Consulting Ltd., Worcestershire, Droitwich, UK.
Tony WhitehouseInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Alastair K DennistonNeuroscience and Ophthalmology Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tonny VeenithNeuroscience and Ophthalmology Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard J BlanchNeuroscience and Ophthalmology Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Assess retinal perfusion in sepsis, compared with uncomplicated postoperative care and healthy controls, and assess the effects of reduced perfusion on retinal structure and visual function. Design: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study between March 2018 and December 2022, with follow-up measures collected 3 to 6 months after discharge. Subjects: Twenty-four patients with sepsis were assessed in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 3 to 6 months later, 45 ICU control patients assessed during elective ICU admission after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery, preoperatively, and 3 to 6 months later, and 15 healthy controls. Testing: Assessments included retinal layer thickness using OCT, retinal perfusion using OCT angiography, and visual function using Humphrey visual field analysis. Organ dysfunction was assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring. Main Outcome Measures: Superficial vascular plexus (SVP) retinal perfusion, OCT retinal ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness, and mean deviation (MD) on Humphrey visual field testing were evaluated. Results: Superficial vascular plexus retinal perfusion was 37.4% lower in patients with sepsis compared with ICU control patients ( Conclusions: Retinal perfusion was impaired in patients with sepsis compared with both healthy controls and patients after major surgery. It was moderately associated with other measures of organ dysfunction assessed by SOFA. Reduced retinal perfusion in both patients with sepsis and patients after major surgery is strongly associated with subsequent GCL thickening and less strongly associated with decreased visual field MD, suggesting reduced retinal perfusion is associated with retinal damage, with consequent visual dysfunction. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

GCLOCTOCTARetinal perfusionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID41035436
PMCPMC12481890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.