ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2025
Identifying Opioid Treatment Programs in Medicaid claims data to support quality improvement.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States, opioid treatment programs (OTPS) are the only provider type licensed to dispense methadone. Recently, U.S. regulators revised OTPs regulations with the aim of making OTP treatment more patient-centered and improving retention in treatment. Creating OTPs retention measures across all OTPs in the U.S. would give OTPs an important window into their retention rates relative to benchmarks and help identify which policies and procedures are most effective in improving retention. In the United States, insurance claims data are one of the few data sources available to create these metrics. Claims data include national provider identifiers; however, the Federal agency that regulates OTPs does not make public which national provider identifiers are associated with OTPs. This study investigated whether other variables captured in Medicaid claims could be used to identify OTPs. We identified two variables: methadone dispensing procedure codes and methadone clinic taxonomy codes, which identified 80 % and 66.8 % of the count of Medicaid-participating OTPs.Place of service and bill type codes were recently added to claims data and may be useful in the future. Methadone can reduce overdose deaths by 50 % but only if patients are maintained on methadone long enough. OTP metrics created with insurance claims data would facilitate efforts to improve retention and outcomes. This study identifies a practical way to identify OTPs in claims data to support such measures in the absence of a Federal list of OTPs and their national provider identifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.