ArticleHaematologica2026
Interim analysis of a multicenter study on patient-guided dose reduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: the RODEO study.
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-guided dose reduction, as explored in the RODEO study, offers a promising approach to alleviate the burden of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Supported by shared decision-making (SDM) and a patient decision aid, this strategy aims to reduce TKI toxicity while maintaining effectiveness. This interim analysis evaluates its effectiveness at six months, focusing on intervention failure, i.e., TKI dose re-escalation due to loss of major molecular remission (MMR) of BCR::ABL1 (>0.1%IS) or expected loss of MMR, and patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptom burden. The SDM-process and decisional conflict are also evaluated. This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial including 148 patients with chronic-phase CML in at least MMR. Patients and their treating hematologists were engaged in an SDM-process and selected a reduced TKI dose. BCR::ABL1 monitoring was conducted regularly; HRQoL and symptom burden was assessed using the scores of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CML24 questionnaires, and IL 156 item list. of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). SDM and decisional conflict were evaluated via SDM-Q-9, SDM-Q-Doc, and the Decisional Conflict Scale. Of 146 patients analyzed, 2.8% experienced intervention failure at six months. Modest statistically significant improvements were seen in multiple symptom scales. SDM was well-evaluated, with low decisional conflict by patients. Patient-guided dose reduction appears safe and beneficial at six months follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.